|
Welcome
Club Information
- Newsletter
- Joining
- By-Laws
- Officers
- Roadmaps-L Mailing List
- Member Services
- Club Events
- News
Map Information
- Official Maps Master List
- Petro Maps Master List
- Dating Rand and Gousha Maps
- Interpreting Rand Codes
Buy/Sell/Trade Maps
- Commercial Dealers
- Member Dealers
- Member's Wish List
- Other Events
(oldgas.com)
Miscellaneous
- Road and Roadmap Links
| |
Purpose
A master list of official state- and province-issued road maps (the OMML)
exists today.
A master list of petroleum road map issues would be a worthy counterpart
to the OMML and is desired by collectors and historians who focus on this
genre of map.
The set of issuers of official maps is finite and fairly constant and
consists of the 50 United States and 12 Canadian provinces and territorial
jurisdictions.
While there were undoubtedly roadblocks on the way to the compilation of
the OMML, any project to catalog petroleum map issues has a higher
magnitude of complexity.
The set of petroleum firms issuing road maps is far from constant and
has changed over the years as a result of incorporation, merger, spin-off,
and dissolution.
Furthermore, no official archives exist for petroleum-issued maps as
they do for state issues.

Scope of project
In order to give this complex listing project some hope of completion,
it is necessary to limit the project's scope.
To this end, a set of inclusion criteria are provided below.
Maps excluded by the various criteria are certainly worthy of
similar documentation efforts and should be considered for inclusion
in this or another list in the future when and if resources become
available.
Project stages
The magnitude of the project is such that it needs to be addressed
incrementally.
It is anticipated that each of the project stages would provide useful
data to collectors in and of itself as well as laying the groundwork
for later stages of the project.
Almost by definition, this project is non-ending, due to the possibility
of discovering previously-unknown petroleum map issues, not to mention
contemporary petroleum map issues such as the new Exxon map series.
Anticipated project stages are listed as follows in likely sequence
of compilation.
Note that in general, later project stages depend on the completion of
previous stages.

Master list of brands and issuers
Definitions
First, some basic definitions:
| brand |
A brand consists of a name or logo used to establish a
recognizable entity in the mind of the consumer.
Brands are typically associated with regional, national, or
even worldwide organizations but can sometimes be associated
with local jobbers or retailers.
Some jobbers and retailers are considered unbranded.
This term is used to denote jobbers and retailers which don't
have a close business relationship with a refiner or distributor
and which lack a contract permitting the jobber or retailer use
of the refiner or distributor's brand name for retail sales.
When this type of loose relationship with a refiner or
distributor exists, these firms act merely as a supply source
for the jobber or retailer who will in turn re-sell the fuel
under their own name.
In spite of the traditional definition of unbranded,
this project's scope shall include maps issued by and imprinted
with the name and/or logo of a local jobber or retailer.
The map issuer may be a firm involved in any part
of the process between production and retail sale so long as
the issuing brand is used in conjunction with the retail sale
of gasoline.
|
|
issuer |
An issuer name consists of the corporate name, which may or may
not be the same as the brand(s) used to retail motor fuels. |
Inclusion criteria
Maps included in the listing shall meet all of the following
conditions:
| 1. |
For the purposes of this master list, a map is considered to
be a petroleum-issued map or atlas if it was issued by a firm
involved in the retail sale of petroleum-based fuels for motor
vehicle highway transport.
Maps issued by large petroleum company marketing departments,
or more localized distributors, jobbers, or retailers shall qualify.
|
| |
Explanation:
Most petroleum road maps were issued by firms whose principal
function was the retail of motor fuels and are generally
associated with those gasoline brands to the exclusion of other
products such as lubricating oil.
While many firms marketed both fuels and lubricants under the
same brand name, others had separate brands (Phillips gasoline
vs. Trop-Arctic oil, Flying A gas vs. Veedol oil,
and so forth).
It does not seem practical for the listing project to encompass
brand names for adjunct products such as lubricants or TBA products.
Yet, a number of interesting maps (mostly of an early vintage)
were issued by firms involved solely in the sale of
petroleum-based lubricants.
In the interest of including these maps, a exception to the
petroleum-based motor fuel criteria is warranted.
Accordingly, maps issued by firms involved in the retail sale
of petroleum-based lubricants shall be included in the brand
listing provided that no accompanying motor fuel
brand name appears on the map.
Maps issued by convenience store or department stores (e.g.,
Sears, Roebuck & Company) are included if the issuing firm
engaged in retail sales of petroleum fuel.
Excluded would be maps issued by tire companies, department
stores, hotels, banks, auto clubs like AAA, etc. unless one or
more qualifying petroleum brand identification accompanies any
identification of non-petroleum entities on the map. |
| 2. |
Inclusion in this master list shall be limited to maps used for
navigation on roads and highways.
|
| |
Explanation:
Many petroleum firms issued a variety of maps used for purposes
other than highway navigation. Examples include the many waterway
maps, maps of various World's Fairs, maps of oil production fields,
and the World War II maps issued by Esso and several other firms.
These maps, while interesting, are not usable for highway navigation
and thus do not qualify for inclusion in this phase of the brand
listing.
Several petroleum firms issue station locator guides.
These maps are typically of a contemporary (1990s) nature, an example
being the locator maps issued by the Sheetz convenience store
chain.
While the cartography of these maps is not detailed and the maps'
emphasis is simply to show station locations, the Sheetz maps
can be used for navigation and thus qualify as road maps for
the purpose of this project.
Several station locator guides give station locations in text form
and include thumbnail-sized maps of the immediate vicinity of each
station. This type of thumbnail map is generally
useful as a supplement to other cartographic resources.
Since these thumbnail maps are not particularly useful for
highway navigation in and of itself, such locator guides shall not
qualify as road maps for the purpose of this project.
Several petroleum firms issued special purpose maps. An example is
Atlantic's fishing map of Pennsylvania which shows particular
varieties of fish common in various rivers and lakes of that state.
While the primary purpose of these fishing maps is to show fishing
spots, the maps consist of data of interest to sport fishermen
superimposed on a regular road map.
Since these maps can be used for highway navigation, their special
purpose and special titling do not disqualify them from inclusion
in the road map brand listing.
|
| 3. |
A petroleum brand name shall be eligible for inclusion in the
listing if the brand name appears in either textual or graphical
form as follows:
 | the brand identification appears on the front or rear cover of
one or more documented folding map issues; |
 | the brand identification appears on the front cover of one or more
documented road atlases; |
 | the brand identification appears on either side of one or more
documented sheet map issues. |
Brand identification applied by means of an adhesive sticker or
rubber stamp shall qualify.
|
| |
Explanation:
Brands or issuers whose identification is limited to the inside of
a fold-up map or to the rear cover of a road atlas shall
not qualify for inclusion in this listing.
When petroleum brand identification is so inconspicuous as to fail
this criteria, it can be assumed to take the role of a mere
advertisement on a map or atlas issued by some non-petroleum entity.
Such a map does not qualify as issued by a petroleum firm. |
| 4. |
Both brands and issuers shall be documented
in the master list.
Each significant change in issuer corporate names shall be
treated as an individual issuing entity even if a change in brand name
usage did not occur as a result.
Likewise, each significant change in brand identification shall be
treated as an individual brand entity even where the issuing
corporation name did not change.
|
| |
Explanation:
Consider the Flying A brand originally derived with
Associated Oil Co. of California but later adopted at the
former Tydol locations in the east and midwest after the
Tide Water and Associated companies merged.
A search for one of the affiliated issuer names would
return a subset of the following brands:
 | Associated |
 | Associated Flying A |
 | Flying A |
 | Tydol |
 | Tydol Flying A |
A search for one of the affiliated brand names would
return an appropriate subset of the following issuer names:
 | Associated |
 | Getty |
 | Tide Water (both pre-1938 and 1956-1967 companies) |
 | Tide Water Associated |
 | Tidewater |
These requirements ease searching of multiple brands used by a
single issuer (i.e., a particular oil company) and makes it easier to
find relationships between issuers and the brands used by those
issuers to identify petroleum products.
|
| 5. |
Issuer names may be identified on the map itself or derived from
external sources.
Maps often include corporate identification on the map cover or
elsewhere such as on a legend inside the map.
Where such identification appears on a map, it shall be used to
the exclusion of identification derived from external sources.
When no corporate identification is present on a map,
an authoritative reference such as the company's annual reports or
National Petroleum News may be used as a source of proper
corporate identification to be used as the map issuer in the listing.
Such external identification shall be consistent with the date
of the map's issue.
| |
Explanation:
Many maps issued by Standard of California (Socal) and their
Standard of Texas subsidiary had identical or extremely similar
covers which did not specifically identify the issuing company.
There is also some overlap between the territory covered by Socal
and its Texas subsidiary.
However, without exception, the specific company name is identified
in the map legend.
This identification shall be used as an authoritative source of
the map issuer, even though the map covers do not specifically
identify "Standard Oil Company of California" or "Standard Oil
Company of Texas".
|
| 6. |
Each differing combination of two or more brand names shall be
considered a distinct entry.
Neither the sequence in which brand names appear on a
map, nor the predominance of one brand name with respect
to other brand name(s) shall be considered significant.
In general, query results for brand combinations shall be
displayed in alphabetical order in the interest of consistency.
|
| |
Explanation:
For example, Western Oil & Fuel Co. of Minneapolis (a
subsidiary of Conoco for the latter part of its life) used
three brands: DS, Mileage, and Western. Considering Western
and its parent Conoco, maps are known to have been issued with
the following combinations of brands:
 | Mileage / DS |
 | Mileage / DS / Western |
 | Western |
 | Conoco |
 | Conoco / Mileage / DS |
Distinct entries in the listing shall be provided for each of these
brand combinations.
A search for one of the brands shall yield a result set
that includes each matching combination of brands in which the
search criteria appears.
A brand name search for the "DS" brand would yield each of the above
brand combinations containing "DS".
An issuer name search for "Conoco" or "Western" would yield each
of the brand combinations issued by the respective issuing company.
|
| 7. |
Each differing combination of two or more issuer names shall be
considered a distinct entry.
Neither the sequence in which issuer names appear on a
map, nor the predominance of one issuer name with respect
to other issuer name(s) shall be considered significant.
In general, query results for issuer combinations shall be
displayed in alphabetical order in the interest of consistency.
|
| |
Explanation:
Beginning with its entry into the United States in the late Fifties,
American Petrofina issued road maps for its Fina brand.
Fina-branded maps of Denver exist which are stylistically similar
to the conventional Fina map and which identify American Petrofina
in the same way as the conventional Fina maps.
But in addition, these Denver issues also bear a reference to
Park Petroleum, Inc., presumably Fina's local jobber/distributor.
This constitutes a map with multiple issuers.
Considering Fina branded maps in the United States, the following
issuer combinations exist:
 | American Petrofina |
 | American Petrofina / Park Petroleum, Inc. |
Distinct entries in the listing shall be provided for each of these
issuer combinations.
A search for one of the issuers shall yield a result set
that includes each matching combination of issuers in which the
search criteria appears.
An issuer search for the "American Petrofina" issuer would yield both
of the above issuer combinations since they contain that issuer name.
But an issuer search for "Park Petroleum, Inc." (or some substring
thereof) would yield only the one issuer combination which included
that company's name.
A brand name search for "Fina" would yield each of the issuer
combinations corresponding to a company or companies issuing
Fina branded maps.
|
| 8. |
Distinct issuers using the same brand to operate in different
regions shall be treated as separate entities with the issuer
name being used to distinguish the brands.
|
| |
Explanation:
A non-exhaustive list of distinct issuers which used the same
brand name at one time or another include:
 | Bay (Colorado) vs. Bay (Michigan) |
 | Colonial (several instances) |
 | Co-Op (several instances) |
 | Erickson Oil Co. vs. Erickson Oil Products |
 | Hudson of Delaware vs. Hudson (Kansas City) |
 | Imperial (several instances) |
 | Martin Oil Co. vs. Martin Oil Service |
 | North Star (Minnesota) vs. North Star (Canada) |
 | Richfield (California) vs. Richfield (New York) |
 | Supertest (Canada) vs. SuperTest (Florida) |
 | White Rose (several instances) |
 | Zephyr (Missouri) vs. Zephyr (Michigan) |
With a worldwide scope, no doubt far more examples will turn
up of totally unrelated issuing companies that happen to use the same
name in different parts of the world.
A special note with respect to Richfield: Though the east coast
and west coast companies using the Richfield brand share some
history (both their origins and disposition), they operated as
separate companies, did not overlap with respect to territory,
and are not known to have ever had map designs which were common
to the two companies.
For these reasons, they are considered separate issuers. |
| 9. |
Maps wherein petroleum brands and/or petroleum issuers
appear in combination with non-petroleum brands/issuers
shall be included in the master list.
Such non-petroleum brands and issuers shall be treated in the same
way as specified above for combinations of petroleum brands/issuers.
|
| |
Explanation:
Many early maps carried both the name of an
petroleum company and that of a tire company.
These are legitimate candidates for inclusion because a
petroleum firm was involved in the issuing of such maps. |
| 10. |
Each operation within a distinct country shall be considered
as a separate issuer.
This is justified by the fact that many major brands market in
the U. S. and Canada as well as in other countries outside North
America.
|
| |
Explanation:
Brand names such as BP, Caltex, Esso, Fina, Mobil, Shell, and Texaco
belongs to a multinational company which owns and operates a
separate subsidiary entity for each country in which it operates.
Moreover, each of the individual national subsidiaries can
issue visually distinct series of maps which occasionally
overlap each others' territories.
This overlap is particularly noticeable for companies operating
in both the U. S. and Canada but is known to occur overseas.
Since later project stages might include more detailed listings
of map cover designs and even individual map issues, it is
desirable from the outset to make these distinctions by country
even when multiple map-issuing companies exist as siblings within
a single corporate family and share a common brand name.
Furthermore, the utility of generating listings of
brands/issuers operating within specific countries
is recognized.
By distinguishing national subsidiaries, this distinction can be
made.
For example, the name of the entity issuing BP-branded maps in
Australia would be listed as "BP Australia Ltd." and the entity
issuing BP-branded maps in France would be
"Société Française des Pétroles BP S. A.".
As provided elsewhere, each changed in the name of these national
issuing entities would result in a distinct list entry.
|
| 11. |
Minor variations in the phraseology of a brand name as it appears
on a map shall not constitute separate brands.
However, in a situation wherein the predominant and unique component
of a brand name changes, each such variant shall be considered a
distinct brand.
In some cases, the only change to a brand name may be a change to
or from possessive form or a change in hyphenization or similar
typographic alteration.
Such variants shall normally constitute distinct brands in the
listing.
|
| |
Explanation:
Early Standard of Indiana signage used a rectangular logo
marked "Standard Service" with both words having equal prominence.
Western Oil and Fuel Company's signage in the Fifties used the wording
"Better Mileage Gasoline", which was later simplified to
"Mileage".
A number of other firms' early brand identification used
words such as "oil", "gas", "products", "service", and "stations".
Marketing experts eventually realized that with signage like
"Standard Service", the secondary word "Service" tended to compete
with the company's principal identification as "Standard".
With the desire to provide strong brand and image recognition in
the mind of the consumer (especially at modern highway speeds),
the secondary words were generally dropped.
Secondary words such as those mentioned above are not unique
and are not protected in the same way as would be a true brand name.
Moreover, they are neither an important or consistent component of
the brand identification.
Words like "Ashland" are are significant; words
like "Products" are not.
Accordingly, secondary words used in signage or other product
identification shall not normally be considered
as part of a brand name.
Examples of simple typographic alteration include the brands
"Clark's" vs. "Clark" and "D-X" vs. "DX".
Each of the typographic variants shall qualify as
distinct brand names because the predominant part of the brand name
changed.
"Mobilgas" vs. "Mobil" would likewise be
considered as distinct brand names.
|
|
Areas worth special mention
The variety of petroleum brands and issuer identification adds complexity to
a comprehensive listing project such as this.
Several specific areas are worth specific mention:
 | In the years closely following the Standard Oil
break-up of 1911, several of the Standard companies used similar
ball-and-bar logos bearing the "Standard" name.
For maps issued during this period, the appropriate Standard
company (California, Indiana, Kentucky, Nebraska, New Jersey,
New York, Louisiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, etc.) would
be listed as the issuer name, with "Standard" listed as the brand. |
 | Maps bearing the Esso logo were issued by several companies
(Standard of Pennsylvania, Standard of Louisiana, and Standard
of New Jersey), the Pennsylvania and Louisiana companies being
subsidiaries of Jersey Standard. The respective issuer names
should correspond to the above company names, and with "Esso"
listed as the brand name.
In later years, the issuer name was "Humble Oil & Refining"
alongside the brand names "Enco", "Esso", and "Humble". |
 | A few companies expanded from regional to multi-regional
marketing territory through acquisition of other companies.
For example, the Socony-Vacuum company acquired several
regional companies (General Petroleum, Lubrite, Wadhams, White
Eagle, White Star, etc.).
For part of the Thirties, the regional companies maintained their
individual identities albeit with increasing use of
Socony-Vacuum's "Mobilgas" brand.
The brand listing entry would use the appropriate regional company
as the issuer name and "Mobilgas" as the brand name. |
 | A similar situation exists with Cities Service and their
regional companies (Crew-Levick, Iowa Oil, Loreco,
Warner-Quinlan, etc.); the brand listing should include the
regional company as the issuer name and "Cities Service" as
the brand.
For maps that had a special variant of the Cities Service
"clover" logo bearing, say, the Crew-Levick name, the brand
listing entry should include both
Cities Service and Crew-Levick as brand names. |
 | Some Sovereign Service maps bore the large Sovereign logo and
in small type on the rear cover bore the names of several
affiliated companies.
Other Sovereign maps had an additional brand name (such as Derby
or Kanotex) overprinted on the front cover.
In the first example, the brand listing entry would include
the individual affiliate names from the small-type listing on
the rear cover as the issuer name and "Sovereign" as the
brand name.
In the second example, the brand listing entry should include
"Derby" or "Kanotex" (as the case may be) with "Sovereign"
as a dual brand. |
 | The territories covered by maps issued by major brands were
limited to the maps offered by the major cartographers and
were further limited by practical constraints such as the
small demand for maps of smaller municipalities.
Since jobbers or retailers cater to a more local audience,
some found it desirable to issue their own maps of
municipalities that weren't part of the major brand's map series.
The process of listing these maps is generally straightforward --
many jobbers or retailers used "generic" map covers printed with
their name and/or logo without mention of an affiliated major
brand.
But a counter-example would be maps like the map of Tampa,
Florida issued by the Sherrill Oil Company operating in that
area; this map includes the Pure logo and the Sherrill name
but based on the design (not a "normal" Pure design) is clearly
a locally-issued map outside the brand's map series.
The brand listing entry for this type of map should use
Sherrill Oil as the issuer name and Pure as the brand
if the major brand name and/or logo appears on the map. |
Data elements for master list of brands and issuers
 | Brand name(s) |
 | Issuer name(s) (Note: care should be taken to consider
significant corporate name changes.) |
 | issuing country |
 | First and last known years of road map or road atlas issue
(Note: this feature exists as a convenience and shall
be superseded at a later date by listings of individual issues.) |
 | Branding method(s) |
 | Map format(s) |
 | Successor brand(s) |
 | Successor issuer(s) |
 | Comments |

Master list of cover designs
The attraction of road map collecting is not limited to the study of
the cartography of individual maps. Some petroleum companies issuing
maps used virtually the same cover art for a span of a decade or more,
while others varied their basic map series design every few years.
Yet others used individualistic designs or photography for every state,
province, or other territory used, varying this cover art every year.
It is recognized that many collectors pursue maps with different cover
art for the aesthetic value of those covers and place an emphasis on
collecting as many distinct designs for their favorite brands/issuers
as possible.
For these collectors, a means by which to determine whether (for example)
the design of Deep Rock maps changed between 1964 and 1965 would
be useful.
To some, this method of distinguishing road maps is more meaningful
(and more practical) than determining the specific cartographic
differences between the two issues.
To this end, a master list of petroleum map cover designs would be a
logical extension to the master list of issuing brands and issuers.
A possible feature of this project stage could include digital images
of each series.
While this document does not attempt to address all the possibilities
and pitfalls of the cover design master list at this early stage of
the project, it is worth setting down a few cautionary notes.
An attempt to document every cover design is impractical
at this project stage and in any event is a formidable task.
This is particularly relevant with respect to maps such as the
beautiful map series issued by Standard Oil of California, Chevron, and
Calso depicting scenic panoramas rendered in water color.
Similar arguments could be made about the Shell photo map series of
the Sixties or the Standard/Amoco series appearing just before the
United States' bicentennial.
Documenting every one of these scenes is not necessary
to the task of documenting the basic cover art series and is more
appropriately left for the final stage of the project when individual
map issues are documented.
Additional thought should be given to the question of the criteria
used to determine what constitutes a new cover design. Subtle changes
in, type style, or wording or appearance of advertising can take place
without a major design change.
While something like a change of type style might appear to be fairly
fundamental, would such a change in and of itself constitute a new
cover design?
Data elements for master list of cover designs
The data elements maintained for each cover design entry should include:
 | Reference to appropriate brand combination entry |
 | Textual description of basic elements of design |
 | Approximate start and end years during which the design was in use |
 | Hyperlink to stored digital image of an example of cover design |
 | Comments |

Master list of individual map issues
The ultimate conclusion of this project would be a complete listing
("compendium") of all petroleum map issues.
It should go without saying that this is the most formidable part of
the project and the one which will truly become a constant-maintenance
item as new maps and variants are discovered and included in the listing.
Since this project phase is dependent on the two preceding phases, it
seems reasonable to defer detailed discussion of the mechanics of this
phase until such time as it is practical to begin work.
Data elements for master list of individual map issues
This is intended as a non-comprehensive list of data elements that
might be used to list individual map issues:
 | Reference to appropriate brand combination entry |
 | Reference to appropriate cover design entry |
 | Territory covered |
 | Cartographer |
 | Date code |
 | Year of issue (derived from date code) |
 | Printed date (where exists) |
 | Status flags (atlas vs. map, generic cover, brand markings
included in interior, list or graphical display of service
station locations appears, etc.) |
 | Map size |
 | Fold style (unfolded sheet, accordion, tri-fold, etc.) |
 | Hyperlink to stored digital image of map cover(s) |
 | Comments |
Jon Roma <roma@uiuc.edu>
September 16, 1999
|